Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:18:07 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2015 23:21:20 GMT -5
This just makes Punk and WWE further apart which makes me sad.
And no one knows who is telling the truth accept them, so no one can comment on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Feb 19, 2015 23:26:32 GMT -5
LOL...HE is suing Punk?? If anything it should be the other way around. This guy is a crooked doctor, and it's not even just Punk who has called him out on his BS. I hope this goes to court and this clown loses his physician's license like he deserves. I mean, I'm sure CM Punk, Bob Holly, etc. all just randomly decided to come up with these stories about this guy's negligence as a doctor just for the hell of it, right? As soon as Punk shows the gigantic scar on his back and has the doctor who cut the growth out of him testify and say he was misdiagnosed, case closed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mox on Feb 19, 2015 23:30:32 GMT -5
I'm sure WWE put a crooked doctor on TV last week. Somehow I doubt.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:18:07 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2015 23:30:58 GMT -5
I don't think anyone can deny Punk looked absolutely terrible during the end of his WWE run. He looks much healthier now. That being said, all he has to do is get that doctor he said took the lump out and he's fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by bababooey on Feb 19, 2015 23:34:20 GMT -5
I think the doctor will get something in this. I think it's incredibly likely that while he probably didn't lie, Punk probably exaggerated. It's basically human nature to do so when you are telling a story about being mistreated.
Punk's best shot would probably be to prove the story was based in truth. The doctor would probably be awarded something but not the full amount. The problem I see is that really only Punk and the doctor know what actually happened. The doctor that removed the growth can really only prove that Punk had a growth. How does he know for sure that Punk tried that hard to get it treated? I think Punk is telling the truth but I'm playing devil's advocate. It's very hard to prove something when it's basically one person's word against another. I feel like the result would tend to favor the doctor in this case as there is definite proof Punk talked badly about him in public.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:18:07 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2015 23:38:48 GMT -5
Considering Amann is stating Punk never even came to him about a lump, Punk has to prove more than just he got it removed by somebody else.
Good luck with that.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Feb 19, 2015 23:39:49 GMT -5
lol @ everyone making up their minds based who they like or dislike. "Well I don't like Punk. He's a prick from what I've read on the internet, so I decide that he's lying." "Oh yeah, week I'm a fan do I decide he's telling the truth."  I will never understand this point of view. He's far from the first former wrestler to air his grievances publicly. Why does no other wrestle catch this much hell for doing shoot interviews? What what about HHH and Stephane? They bad mouthed Punk on Raw, why is that okay? First of all, no, he's legitimately a terrible  ing person. He's pissed off and mistreated a LOT of people in his day, a few of who are good friends of mine. I don't give a crap about anything he says. Because people don't throw everyone under the bus like he did. Most people don't blame doctors for doing their jobs like he did. IF what he said is true, Amann is in serious crap, but he has been working for WWE for years and he never, not once, had to deal with a concussion or staph infection? Wouldn't there be other former talent who would've been misdiagnosed for something serious? Why is Punk, the guy with the biggest mouth and grudge, the only one blaming this guy for anything? Because he's an idiot. Edit: as I said in my last post. This is the last I'm saying on the matter. You don't think guys wrestle with concussions all the time in the WWE? Wrestlers don't have a union to fight for them and they don't get paid unless they wrestle at shows. They wrestle through severe injuries regularly. Punk was one of the rare guys who had the financial stability where he didn't have to put up with it anymore and called the company out on it. And Punk mistreating people, as you claim, and being a big meanie to fans by refusing to pose for a picture with disrespectful fans really has nothing to do with this situation at all. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:18:07 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2015 23:41:07 GMT -5
First of all, no, he's legitimately a terrible ing person. He's pissed off and mistreated a LOT of people in his day, a few of who are good friends of mine. I don't give a crap about anything he says. Because people don't throw everyone under the bus like he did. Most people don't blame doctors for doing their jobs like he did. IF what he said is true, Amann is in serious crap, but he has been working for WWE for years and he never, not once, had to deal with a concussion or staph infection? Wouldn't there be other former talent who would've been misdiagnosed for something serious? Why is Punk, the guy with the biggest mouth and grudge, the only one blaming this guy for anything? Because he's an idiot. Edit: as I said in my last post. This is the last I'm saying on the matter. You don't think guys wrestle with concussions all the time in the WWE? Wrestlers don't have a union to fight for them and they don't get paid unless they wrestle at shows. They wrestle through severe injuries regularly. Punk was one of the rare guys who had the financial stability where he didn't have to put up with it anymore and called the company out on it. And Punk mistreating people, as you claim, and being a big meanie to fans by refusing to pose for a picture with disrespectful fans really has nothing to do with this situation at all. I'm not speaking about his character any further. I've made that clear. It has nothing to do with fans. You obviously missed the entire point of every single post I've made in here. So therefore, I will not be replying to you any further on this topic. |
|
|
|
Post by Mox on Feb 19, 2015 23:41:26 GMT -5
I think the doctor will get something in this. I think it's incredibly likely that while he probably didn't lie, Punk probably exaggerated. It's basically human nature to do so when you are telling a story about being mistreated. Punk's best shot would probably be to prove the story was based in truth. The doctor would probably be awarded something but not the full amount. The problem I see is that really only Punk and the doctor know what actually happened. The doctor that removed the growth can really only prove that Punk had a growth. How does he know for sure that Punk tried that hard to get it treated? I think Punk is telling the truth but I'm playing devil's advocate. It's very hard to prove something when it's basically one person's word against another. I feel like the result would tend to favor the doctor in this case as there is definite proof Punk talked badly about him in public. You could be right. And why would this guy sue if it's sooooo easy for Punk to discredit him? |
|
|
|
Post by Jaz on Feb 19, 2015 23:51:45 GMT -5
Considering Amann is stating Punk never even came to him about a lump, Punk has to prove more than just he got it removed by somebody else. Good luck with that. Hmmm, I haven't heard any stories about Amann being a dick when people met him in airports, so I don't think he's lying. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:18:07 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2015 23:52:45 GMT -5
Considering Amann is stating Punk never even came to him about a lump, Punk has to prove more than just he got it removed by somebody else. Good luck with that. Hmmm, I haven't heard any stories about Amann being a dick when people met him in airports, so I don't think he's lying. Never mentioned any airports, now did I? |
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Feb 19, 2015 23:53:26 GMT -5
You don't think guys wrestle with concussions all the time in the WWE? Wrestlers don't have a union to fight for them and they don't get paid unless they wrestle at shows. They wrestle through severe injuries regularly. Punk was one of the rare guys who had the financial stability where he didn't have to put up with it anymore and called the company out on it. And Punk mistreating people, as you claim, and being a big meanie to fans by refusing to pose for a picture with disrespectful fans really has nothing to do with this situation at all. I'm not speaking about his character any further. I've made that clear. It has nothing to do with fans. You obviously missed the entire point of every single post I've made in here. So therefore, I will not be replying to you any further on this topic. You're the one throwing out claims about Punk's character based on what you know about him through other friends who worked with him in Japan and ROH, yet you're not willing to elaborate on any of your claims. If you don't want to go any further in elaborating on it when someone asks you a follow up question, what exactly was the point of you even bringing it up to begin with? Just so everyone here can know that you have friends who worked with Punk? |
|
|
|
Post by Jaz on Feb 19, 2015 23:53:34 GMT -5
Hmmm, I haven't heard any stories about Amann being a dick when people met him in airports, so I don't think he's lying. Never mentioned any airports, now did I? That changes everything. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:18:07 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2015 23:57:40 GMT -5
Never mentioned any airports, now did I? That changes everything. I suggest you wear a helmet. You need it. |
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Feb 19, 2015 23:58:49 GMT -5
Considering Amann is stating Punk never even came to him about a lump, Punk has to prove more than just he got it removed by somebody else. Good luck with that. If this is a defamation/libel/slander lawsuit, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. Doesn't he need to prove that (A) Punk was deliberately dishonest about the facts, (B) that he meant to defame the doctor's character, and (C) that the doctor was actually harmed by the statements (i.e. loss of income/future earnings, tangible damage to reputation, etc)? I don't think, if by some craziness that this went to trial, they would ask Punk to prove something that took place between just he and the doctor? I can tell you for a fact that Punk had a gross-looking lump on his back because I saw it on TV. I do see where there are some holes in Punk's version of events (like the 2nd or 3rd incident he mentions where he discussed the lump with the doctor... it doesn't make sense/wasn't clear to me how that conversation ended), but if Punk can produce some sort of documentation that shows that he had a pretty significant procedure done within weeks of leaving the company, I think this thing probably gets dismissed. |
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Feb 19, 2015 23:59:25 GMT -5
Whoa whoa whoa whoa...pump the damn brakes....
So this week, we all like Punk right? Cause when he was gone but under contract we loved him, then when he was released and going to the UFC we laughed at him and said he was overrated. Then he made statements and he was just a bitter washed up wrestler and now he's getting sued and he has a case cause the doctor is crooked.....so, we're Pro Punk this week right? Well...2 more days until next week and we can be Anti-Punk
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:18:08 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2015 0:00:23 GMT -5
I don't think Punk was lying, but it's believable that he'd exaggerate it
|
|
|
|
Post by Jaz on Feb 20, 2015 0:01:31 GMT -5
I suggest you wear a helmet. You need it. And I suggest you get your brain checked. You need it. |
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Feb 20, 2015 0:01:46 GMT -5
Whoa whoa whoa whoa...pump the damn brakes.... So this week, we all like Punk right? Cause when he was gone but under contract we loved him, then when he was released and going to the UFC we laughed at him and said he was overrated. Then he made statements and he was just a bitter washed up wrestler and now he's getting sued and he has a case cause the doctor is crooked.....so, we're Pro Punk this week right? Well...2 more days until next week and we can be Anti-Punk I don't think that's quite the sequence of events... IMO, there have usually been a pretty defined Punk sympathizers vs. Punk haters lines. |
|
|
|
Post by Darkhawk on Feb 20, 2015 0:03:36 GMT -5
There's a lot of stories from past wrestlers complaining about the doctors in WWE. So by that I don't think Punk was lying about the staph infection at all. Amann is just going to screw himself on this one.
|
|
