AEW not changing the game?

First and foremost, this is simply my personal opinion and I am not here to start any arguments or fights. I am not here to bash AEW or say that WWE is better. I am a fan of wrestling. Period. I enjoy all wrestling and I am not looking for any company to go out of business or for people to lose their jobs.

What bothers me most about AEW is that they claimed that they would change the game. They claimed they would do things the "right" way and would consistently knock WWE for doing "wrong" things. I have watched every single episode of AEW Dynamite and do not see how they have "changed the game." AEW has failed to gain over 1 million viewers each week and the wrestling on the show is no different/ better than wrestling on NXT or NJPW. There are things that I fully enjoyed such as Jericho's title run, and the Cody v. MJF feud, but there are many things that have been bothering me as of late (again this is my opinion, and I am not trying to start fights).

Here are some things that bother me:
1) The usage of Kenny Omega & the Young Bucks - Kenny was the most sought-after free agent before signing with AEW. He had phenomenal matches in NJPW and proved that he was a draw. He has since lost numerous 1-1 matches to top stars, and has been thrown into a makeshift tag-team. The Young Bucks lose way more than they should and it is frustrating when JR says that they are the best tag team but have NEVER won the AEW titles. He should not be able to say that yet. Also, they should have never lost to Private Party in the first round of the tournament. That win for Private Party has done nothing for them since and looking back it was a bad booking decision. They also lost to a new team of Omega/Page with all of their experience.

2) The usage of "Jobbers" - I think we can all agree that jobbers and enhancement talent play an important role in this business. Their job is solely to get another talent over. For some reason, AEW doesn't understand how this role works, and thinks that every single match needs to play out 50/50. For example, on the most recent Dynamite, Moxley gave #10 way, WAY too much offense when Mox is supposed to look good leading into his title defense tonight. Also, Omega gave some nobody a ridiculous amount of offense when we have never seen that guy again. If they want to argue and say that they are trying to build other stars, then that should lead to something.

3) Mark Stunt - Is there really more that needs to be said here? I heard Bubba Ray compare him to Spike Dudley recently and I could not be more taken back by the fact that someone like Bubba thought this.

4) AEW title - To date, the AEW title has only been held by past WWE guys. I understand that the company isn't even a year old yet, but it is still interesting to me.

5) TNT title - The name alone kills me, but the fact that Lance Archer (a guy who only signed recently) is in the finals is another issue to me. AEW is signing too many guys at a rate that no one can keep up with. A lot of their original signings such as Kip Sabian, Darby Allen, and Shawn Spears are being relegated to AEW Dark while Archer gets pushed to the moon.

6) The women's division - AEW's women's division is lacking of starpower and talent. The matches are bad and the Brandi Rhodes storyline was potentially a career-killer for all involved.

7) The win-loss record - I believe that the win-loss record is doing more harm than good. There are almost NO people with .500 percentages. You are either a winner, or a loser. Those that are losing, have almost no hope of recovering. For example, the last time checked, Shawn Spears had a 0-7 or 0-8 record. How do you save a guy, or make a guy look like a threat with that record? There is a reason that you do not keep track of every single win or loss. You can rebuild a guy with a few wins on TV and make him look like he has turned things around, however if you show that his record is 3-9 then it takes that all away. I know that everyone hates the Jinder Mahal title reign, but WWE was able to pull that off because they were able to make him look like a winner again. If they showed a record for Mahal, it would be even worse.

8) The rankings - AEW has shown time and time again that the rankings are pointless. How is Brodie Lee the next title contender when he has only beaten jobbers? Why have a fatal four way match to determine the number one contender for the women's title when you have a number one contender in your rankings? Essentially, the #4 ranked person could pin the #3 ranked person and get a title shot over the #1 ranked person? That doesn't make any sense.

9) The tag division - One of the things that is supposed to make AEW stand above the other promotions is their tag division. To date, the only two pairs of Tag champions are SCU and Omega/Page. I understand that the company is still new and we don't want shor title reigns, but how does a makeshift team of Omega/Page hold the titles before the Young Bucks and Pentagon & Fenix? Also, how can you take things seriously when you have Marko Stunt/ Jungle Boy almost beating Pentagon/ Fenix and when you have that Michael Nakazawa tag match a few weeks ago? Omega and Page were not even the #1 ranked tag team when they challenged for the titles. They won a fatal four way (which I talked about before).

10) Sports feel - These issues, complaints, problems, whatever you want to call them, are in no particular order. However, this one is my biggest gripe with AEW. AEW claimed time and time again that they would have a "sports feel" to their promotion. I would beg to differ after numerous evidence and examples from the episodes I have watched (and again I have watched EVERY episode). I know many people have been complaining about Matt Hardy and the silliness there, but that is not the only example. One of my biggest problems with NJPW is the fact that there are almost no DQ's and that you can introduce weapons whenever you want. That has become the case in AEW as well. There have been many matches where a table, or some other weapon, has been used and the ref doesn't call for a DQ. How can you willingly use a table during a match and not consider that an unfair advantage?

** The referees - This is not a huge issue, but I cannot stand that obsession they have with Aubrey Edwards. She is not the first female ref and she will not be the last. Also, the refs are almost always looking at people when they are doing bad things and never call a DQ.

These are not small things to me and have really been taking away from my enjoyment of AEW. Do not claim to change the world of wrestling, only to make similar mistakes as your competition. No one is perfect, but you should be doing the things you set out to do.