|
Post by bigshab421 on Mar 15, 2015 8:42:17 GMT -5
The more I think about it, some of the moves WWE are making this WrestleMania season point all directions to Brock retaining/staying.
Reason? Daniel Bryan and John Cena. I fully believe they will put the IC and US titles on them for the fact that when Brock goes away in between his defenses, Cena and Bryan are right there, defending the midcard titles on PPVs. That way they can have selling points and reasons to watch.....Battleground.
Maybe I'm crazy, but this may be a reason
|
|
havoc7179
Main Eventer
What is this?
Joined on: Oct 16, 2012 9:11:18 GMT -5
Posts: 4,189
|
Post by havoc7179 on Mar 15, 2015 9:16:44 GMT -5
I was thinking one of two things regarding Daniel Bryan and John Cena.
A) They're being used to elevate the titles so that if any future former stars come in and take the title, there is a perceived main title being defended on the PPV
B) They're being used to have a unification title match.
Either one works well.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Mar 15, 2015 9:22:23 GMT -5
Plus I think it's too obvious that Roman is going to win, so they're going to have him NOT win as a swerve... But at the same time, I think they just want me to think that.
But could you imagine how great PPV's would be with Roman (or Seth) as WWE Champ, Bryan as IC Champ, and Cena as US Champ? Like all three titles would be getting amazing matches as top spots on the PPV's. Like do you guys even understand how excited I am for the future of WWE?!
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Mar 15, 2015 9:26:01 GMT -5
I'm thinking Brock will retain as well. I like Roman a lot, but I still want Brock to win.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 11:24:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2015 9:29:59 GMT -5
I'm thinking Reigns wins and Rollins cashes in.
|
|
|
Post by attitudesback on Mar 15, 2015 9:45:16 GMT -5
Cena winning still makes no sense to me. They've literally booked him as a has been, while Rusev is this "ultimate monster". If Rusev loses, his momentum is majorly ruined in my eyes. Anyone else with me on that? I still don't understand the Lesnar/Reigns bullcrap. If Lesnar is appearing on Raw the night after, what for? If he's lost his title, how are they gonna have a streak breaker and whatever just go "well crap, I'm off. bye!" ? Reigns/Rollins is boring even if they threw a title in there, match has happened nearly 60 times already. Honestly have no idea how they're going to do this, but if they do just go Reigns/Rollins for the title it's going to be awful.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 11:24:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2015 9:47:05 GMT -5
I would love for Brock to retain and stick around in WWE.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Mar 15, 2015 9:50:17 GMT -5
I'm still holding onto hope that Heyman aligns with Roman to screw over Brock. That way if Brock doesn't re-sign we have an outlet for Heyman. And if he does re-sign, Brock can return a few months later as more of a face. Roman then moves onto feuds with Cena, Bryan, & Orton.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Charisma on Mar 15, 2015 10:03:27 GMT -5
I smell a cash in, Rollins deserves some limelight. He has been one of the very few positives in the last year.
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Mar 15, 2015 10:15:14 GMT -5
If Brock stays I'd love it.
If he leaves and drops the title to Roman, they would need to have Rollins cash in immediately!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 11:24:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2015 11:08:54 GMT -5
I'm still holding onto hope that Heyman aligns with Roman to screw over Brock. That way if Brock doesn't re-sign we have an outlet for Heyman. And if he does re-sign, Brock can return a few months later as more of a face. Roman then moves onto feuds with Cena, Bryan, & Orton. Wouldn't be totally opposed to this. What would Heyman's reasoning be to turn on Brock though?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 11:24:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2015 11:15:28 GMT -5
This is me if Brock retains:
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Mar 15, 2015 11:40:38 GMT -5
Wfigs a few months ago "WHAT THE IS THIS PARTTIME BULL$HIT THE CHAMP SHOULD BE ON ALL THE RAWS AND ALL THE SMACKDOWNS AND ALL THE WORLD TITLES NEED TO BE SEPERATED AGAIN AHHHH" Wfigs now: "Plz don't go Brock"
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 11:24:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2015 11:53:50 GMT -5
If Brock stays I'd love it. If he leaves and drops the title to Roman, they would need to have Rollins cash in immediately! Yeah and then have Roman pin Rollins too.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Mar 15, 2015 12:02:48 GMT -5
I'm still holding onto hope that Heyman aligns with Roman to screw over Brock. That way if Brock doesn't re-sign we have an outlet for Heyman. And if he does re-sign, Brock can return a few months later as more of a face. Roman then moves onto feuds with Cena, Bryan, & Orton. Wouldn't be totally opposed to this. What would Heyman's reasoning be to turn on Brock though? Not 100% sure. But it could be anything from Heyman is close to Roman's family, to he views him as the new next big thing. I'm sure they could figure something out.
|
|
|
Post by ✖ AJ on Mar 15, 2015 12:08:14 GMT -5
I'm still holding onto hope that Heyman aligns with Roman to screw over Brock. That way if Brock doesn't re-sign we have an outlet for Heyman. And if he does re-sign, Brock can return a few months later as more of a face. Roman then moves onto feuds with Cena, Bryan, & Orton. Wouldn't be totally opposed to this. What would Heyman's reasoning be to turn on Brock though? Lesnar is no longer the next big thing and, unlike Reigns, isn't there every night to prove it. Plus, Heyman manages world champions, right? Right. The only dilemma with that is the Seth Rollins situation, which is why I don't think it would happen even though I'd like to see it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 11:24:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2015 12:18:05 GMT -5
Hell, if Heyman turned on Brock to manage Big Show back in 2002, then I could easily see him switching over to Reigns. Reigns needs a mouthpiece, he and Brock both have pretty bad mic skills...baby.
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Mar 15, 2015 12:44:10 GMT -5
I don't understand why people don't "get" the concept that Brock beating Taker and Cena was so that a guy like Roman could benefit from it. The WWE didn't just give Brock arguably the strongest booking ever over the past year so that Seth could cash in MITB on him. Brock ended the streak. Saying he dominated Cena would be an understatement.
How does Roman loosing and Seth cashing in MITB benefit anyone? Roman doesn't gain anything and Seth still looks like a typical cowardly heel. I've said it before but if Brock resigns for another year then I think it would benefit Roman to loose, go on a year-long redemption run like Shawn in '95, and beat Brock next year. However, Brock seems to be gone after WM. I think it is too soon for Roman to be the top guy but since Brock is going Roman NEEDS to beat him. If not then the last year of booking for Brock has no payoff what so ever.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Mar 15, 2015 12:50:06 GMT -5
WWE has unapologetically and stubbornly stuck with their plan all along, despite having it thrown back in their faces on multiple occasions. They're not going to give up now. The time to pull the plug on the Roman Reigns rocket to the moon push was a month ago before they put him in the ring with Brock Lesnar, not at Wrestlemania. It would ruin him.
Roman Reigns is beating Lesnar clean at Wrestlemania. Anything else would be one of the most shocking endings I've seen in my sixteen years as a wrestling fan. Lesnar ended the streak for a reason, and this is it. Whether it's the right thing to do or not is irrelevant, it's what Vince wants, and that's blatantly obvious. What Vince wants, Vince gets.
|
|
|
Post by A-Rob on Mar 15, 2015 12:53:32 GMT -5
If Brock retains I would be so happy. He should be champion for at least another year.
|
|